Connect your ERP to the systems that run alongside it.
Integrations for NetSuite, JD Edwards, and the systems that connect to them. CRM, eCommerce, payments, EDI, warehouse, billing, and banking wired in using SuiteCloud, BSSV, AIS, iPaaS connectors, or custom code. The approach depends on your stack.
Native tooling for both ERPs, plus iPaaS through Celigo, Boomi, and MuleSoft when off-the-shelf connectors fit. GSI recommends the approach that matches your environment, not the one with the highest margin.
Three triggers that bring buyers to GSI for
an integration project.
Most integration projects start from one of three places. Knowing which one you're in changes the conversation.
Manual data entry between systems is consuming hours every week.
Finance, ops, or customer service teams are re-keying data between systems. The integration cost is now smaller than the headcount cost of doing it by hand.
An iPaaS connector is breaking on every NetSuite or JDE upgrade.
Custom-coded or unmaintained iPaaS jobs from 5 years ago are throwing errors every release cycle. Time to refactor onto a current connector or rebuild.
A new system is being added and the integration needs to be scoped first.
A new CRM, eCommerce platform, WMS, or payment processor is on the roadmap. You want the integration scope and cost in front of you before signing the new vendor contract.
Six approaches across NetSuite and JD Edwards. The right one depends on your stack.
BSSV / AIS / Orchestrations
Celigo, Boomi, MuleSoft
SuiteApp
SuiteApp is the NetSuite marketplace for pre-built applications from certified partners. GSI implements the most common: Avalara for tax compliance, Paystand and Versapay for payments, RF-Smart for warehouse management, SPS Commerce for retailer EDI, Celigo and Boomi for iPaaS connectors.
Custom integrations
When iPaaS connectors do not fit and a SuiteApp does not exist, GSI builds custom integrations. SuiteScript and SuiteTalk for NetSuite. BSSV and AIS for JDE. Examples: a proprietary EDI mapping for a specific retailer, a complex revenue recognition flow, or a real-time inventory sync between a custom WMS and NetSuite.
EDI
EDI integrations connect NetSuite or JDE to retailer trading partners. ANSI X12, EDIFACT, or proprietary formats. Major VAN providers: SPS Commerce, TrueCommerce, B2BGateway, OpenText. Common transaction sets: 850 (PO), 855 (PO ack), 856 (ASN), 810 (invoice), 940/945 (warehouse shipping), 997 (functional ack).
Distributors and CPG operators selling into Amazon, Walmart, Target, Costco, or other compliance-driven retailers.
How GSI runs integration engagements.
Most integration shops specialize in one ERP and one approach. GSI delivers integrations across NetSuite, JD Edwards, and HubSpot from one team, with both ends of the integration in-house and an architecture review before any build work begins.
Multi-platform integration expertise.
GSI delivers integrations across NetSuite, JD Edwards, and HubSpot from one team. Most integration shops specialize in one ERP. The cross-platform fluency matters when an integration spans both ERPs, when post-acquisition consolidation puts two stacks under one roof, or when a multi-entity cloud migration requires the same data flowing into different platforms for different subsidiaries.
Both ends of the integration in-house..
The same consultants who configure NetSuite or JD Edwards also build the integration code that connects them to your other systems. No vendor finger-pointing when something breaks at 3am, no two-team handoff between the ERP team and the integration team.
This matters most after go-live. Production integration failures rarely fall cleanly on one side or the other. Having the same bench own both ends shortens the diagnosis from days to hours.
Architecture review before build..
GSI delivers an integration architecture review that documents the recommended approach, SuiteCloud, BSSV, iPaaS, custom, or SuiteApp, before any implementation work begins. Fixed scope, fixed price, 1 to 3 weeks.
The deliverable gives you the materials to make a build-vs-buy decision with cost and timeline ranges in front of you. You leave with the analysis whether or not GSI does the build.
Integration Architecture Review
A structured review of your current integration state and the right approach for each integration on the roadmap. Fixed scope. Fixed price. One to three weeks. The deliverable goes with you whether or not GSI builds anything.
Current integrations mapped. Every active connection between NetSuite or JDE and the rest of your stack documented in one place.
Gap analysis vs your goals. Where the integration layer is keeping pace with the business and where it is falling behind.
Recommended approach per integration. SuiteCloud, BSSV, iPaaS, SuiteApp, or custom, with the reasoning documented for each one.
Cost and timeline ranges. Enough detail to make build-vs-buy decisions and budget the work for the next planning cycle.
Four anonymized examples of integrations GSI has shipped.
Every integration is shaped by the systems on either side of it. These four are illustrative of the patterns we see most often, anonymized by industry and approach only.
Daily inventory valuation reports delivered to sales reps at 6:30am.
An agricultural distributor automated daily inventory valuation reporting using NetSuite saved searches and a scheduled distribution flow. Reports landed in sales-rep inboxes at 6:30am every morning, replacing a manual report build that had been consuming an hour of finance time per day.
Approach: NetSuite saved searches, SuiteScript scheduled distribution
NetSuite connected to sales, eCommerce, warehouse, payments, and banking through Celigo.
Approach: Celigo iPaaS, NetSuite SuiteCloud endpoints
RF-Smart WMS integration improved ordering accuracy, inventory tracking, and labor productivity.
Approach: RF-Smart SuiteApp, NetSuite native
Integration layer rebuilt after a previous partner failed at GL and billing.
Approach: Architecture review, SuiteScript custom + SuiteApp
Most integration projects fit cleanly. Some need a conversation.
Most operators reaching this page have an integration project ready to scope. A handful are better served by a different starting point. Here is the rough split.
An integration engagement typically helps
- You have a defined integration project with one or more system pairs to wire up
- An existing iPaaS or custom integration is failing on platform upgrades and needs replatforming
- You're adding a new system and want the integration scoped before signing the vendor contract
- A previous partner failed and you need a rebuild with the gaps documented up front
- You need EDI compliance for a new retailer trading partner
Worth a deeper conversation
- The integration is a one-time data migration rather than an ongoing connection
- You only need a single CSV upload pattern and have the technical resources in-house
- You're evaluating ERP platforms and the integration question is upstream of the platform decision
- Your existing partner is delivering well and you only want a second opinion on architecture
Not sure which side your situation falls on?
A 30-minute scoping call walks through your current state and what you're trying to do next. You leave with a clear recommendation, even when the recommendation is something other than an integration engagement.
The questions automotive parts manufacturers ask us most.
Should we use Celigo, Boomi, or custom integration?
How long does a typical integration take?
What is the difference between SuiteCloud, SuiteConnector, and SuiteApp?
Can GSI maintain integrations after they go live?
What if we already have integrations from another partner that need fixing?
Does GSI support EDI for retailer trading partners?
Start with a call.
We will map your current integration state and recommend an approach for each connection on your list.